Differences CVS / CVS NT

( CVSSCC , VS .NET, WIN 2000/XP )

Type: Public Status:Closed Created: 30 Mar 06 03:00 Updated: 30 Mar 06 03:00

You value our support on this issue as "good, I have successfully managed to solve problem with your help". Click here to resubmit your opinion.

--> Igor Pushkov (admin) at 30 Mar 06 03:00 writes

Both plug-ins mostly have equal in functionality. Additional features
of CVS NT mostly lies outside of plug-in scope.
The main differences of CVS NT is that it support so called
"merge-point" technology and support native windows authentication.
Some other enchantments are planned but nor ready (file and folder
rename). CVS NT now also commercially supported. However it is not
know does this good or not, because not appears any new releases after
it receives commercial support.
Both plug-in series are maintained and new versions 1.4 and 2.1 will
come in next few weeks.

--> Pamas GmbH Schwiontek (user) at 30 Mar 06 03:00 writes

We have to decide either to use \"natural\" Unix CVS with CVS-SCC-Proxy or
CVS-NT for Linux with CVS-SCC-Proxy-NT.
What I found on your website is that the natural CVS is faster whereas
CVS-NT has some more features.

My question: Are there any differences between CVS-SCC-Proxy and
CVS-SCC-Proxy-NT, i.e. more or other features?
What about the problem in ticket
http://www.pushok.com//tickets_addmodify.php?id=983 ? Is it resolved in
one/both of the Proxies?

Melanie

Rate this ticket:

Not useful at all

Partially useful

Useful

Very useful

Ticket

Differences CVS / CVS NT