dotSoftwaredotDevelopmentdotCustomersdotAbout us
PushOk logoblank
bullet Home
bullet My software
bullet Support
bullet My payments
bullet My info
bullet Subscriptions
bullet Voting
bullet Contact us
fast linksFast Links
news&eventsnews and events

2012-12-21 
Major update of SVNCOM version 1.7.2 are finaly released

2012-12-21 
Major update of SVN SCC plug-in - versions 1.7.2 are finaly released

Lightweight embedded Node.js database with MongoDB API.

Ticket

Search go
PushOk Logo blank
leftTicketright

PowerBuilder 11.5 multiple objects with the same name

( CVSSCC , 11.5, 1.5.x, WIN XP, intel, Open SUSE 10.2  )
Type: Public Status:Closed Created: 11 Nov 09 11:00 Updated: 15 Mar 10 03:00
--> Oleg Akolupin (admin)  at 15 Mar 10 03:00 writes

Have been released new version of SVNSCC plug-in.
Please test it.
You can download it here
http://pushok.com/soft_download.php?idprogram=3
--> Alexander Somov (admin)  at 12 Nov 09 11:00 writes

According to the PB docs, "Generally when you work with source control,
objects with the same name should not exist in more than one PBL in the
same directory". Taking into account the way the PowerBuilder uses to work
with version control systems, it becomes obvious: objects exported from one
library will be overwritten by the objects with the same names from another
library.
The workaround suggested in the "Best practices" section: "Create a unique
subdirectory under the project path for each PBL in the source-controlled
targets
This practice avoids issues that can arise if you copy or move objects from
one PBL to another in the same target". This is true not only for copy and
move, but also in all cases when PBLs may contain objects with the same
name.
--> Charles Stagg (user)  at 11 Nov 09 11:00 writes

We have an application that has many objects that have the same name but
they are in multiple pbl\'s. Right now on the checkin, the ojbects are all
added to the module Root on the cvs server. Is there a way to have PushOK
checkin the objects in subdirectory of the PBL name. This way I would have
not duplicate name problems.
Rate this ticket:
Not useful at all
Partially useful
Useful
Very useful



You are 9530847 visitor since 20 Jan 2003.
621 visitors today and 3 online right now.
blank left to top right blank

© Copyright by PushOk Software, 2003-2024, webmaster@pushok.com